Refer this story to your friend Print this story

Cover story

Can SEOs survive the "Penguin attack"?

For the past several years, Google has been continually updating its PageRank algorithm to clear the web spam and reward websites that play by its rules. The search engine giant has struck again, with “ Penguin” this time. What does it mean to search engine optimizers (SEOs), and how they can survive the attack...

Manish K. Pandey 14 August 2012

The world turned upside down for the whole new breed of SEO (Search Engine Optimization) experts across the globe when Ken Krogue, a contributor at Forbes Magazine, penned an article title “The Death Of SEO: The Rise of Social, PR, And Real Content” on July 20, 2012. It was followed up with another article title “The Death Of SEO: Generating Real Content” on August 4, 2012. And what followed these two articles was not just a flurry of responses or feedbacks (both the articles have been viewed by some 1,10,426 people so far), but also thousands questioning “If it was for true?”

In one of his pieces Krogue had spoken about an exhaustive conversation which he had with a Utah (United States) based SEO consultant named Adam Torkildson over lunch, sometime back in March 2012. The revelation was “Google is in the process of making the SEO industry obsolete, SEO will be dead in two years.” Krogue doubted the words, but a month later, on April 24, 2012, when Google proved Torkildson right by announcing the launch of an all new search engine algorithm code named “Penguin”, he shared the conversation with the world, creating a sensation. 

It’s a fact that whenever Google has come out with a new algorithm for PageRank (a link analysis algorithm, named after Founder Larry Page and used by the search engine, that assigns a numerical weighting to each element of a hyperlinked set of documents, such as the world wide web, with the purpose of measuring its relative importance within the set), it has created ripples across the digital world. After all, every single individual or company wants to be in the top league when it comes to Google search results page – a miss means losing out (in terms of customers, brand recall, et al) to a competitor that has managed its way to the top.

If industry experts are to be believed, Google alters its PageRank algorithm over 500 times a year. Most of these changes are minor, but major updates keep on happening at regular intervals which keep search engine optimizers on their toes. A case in point is Panda, a prominent change to Google’s search ranking algorithm that was first released in February 2011 (interestingly, there have been about 13 data refreshes of it since then). The algorithm made news for cracking down on sites with poor quality, and plagiarized content, as well as sites with a high ad-to-content ratio. Its impact on PageRank too was evident. CNET, a tech media website, reported a sudden rise in the rankings of news websites and social networking sites, and a drop in rankings for sites plagued with advertisements.

Interestingly, despite this and several other changes to the PageRank algorithm the SEO industry has been not just been able to survive but flourish. In fact, a new eMarketer study says that search ad spend is expected to grow 27% from 2011 to 2012, up from $15.36 billion to $19.51 billion. And by 2016, it is expected to reach almost $30 billion annually. As expected Google sites lead the US explicit core search market with 66.8% market share, followed by Microsoft and Yahoo sites with 15.7% and 13% market share respectively (as per the latest data released by comScore on August 15, 2012). If this is the situation, then why there is such an outcry on the launch of yet another update – Penguin?

When 4Ps B&M got in touch with Torkildson, who made the shocking revelation, he gave us the same response which he had been giving to a host of bloggers and writers since the statement was published in Forbes (although this time he sounded more diplomatic than the way he was quoted by Krogue). “Google is definitely pretty far away from being able to personalise everything, and make their search results 100% accurate. But they are working on it very hard, and by invoking Moore’s Law on their behalf, if their algorithm today doubles in effectiveness two years from now, most search engine optimizers will be out of a job just because of that fact,” says Torkildson. Pessimism is evident from the way he states things, but is it really the situation?
When the launch of Penguin was announced by Google on April 24, 2012, Matt Cutts, Head of the webspam team at Google, had stated on the Official blog that “in the next few days, we’re launching an important algorithm change targeted at web-spam.

The change will decrease rankings for sites that we believe are violating Google’s existing quality guidelines. We’ve always targeted web-spam in our rankings, and this algorithm represents another improvement in our efforts to reduce webspam and promote high quality content.” Therefore, one can say that it’s nothing but an ongoing battle between “Black Hat” search engine optimizers and Google, one which will probably never be resolved. The basic idea behind Penguin is to put a stop to “Black Hat” techniques and reward ethical SEOs.

For starters, while “White hat” search engine optimizers are the ones who focus on improving the usability of a website by creating quality content which is relevant to that particular website, “Black hat” search engine optimizers use unethical techniques and tactics (tactics such as keyword stuffing, cloaking, and content spinning), primarily by looking for shortcuts or loopholes, to rank a website higher than it deserves to be ranked.

The Penguin targets all such tactics that search engine optimizers have been using for the past several years, all to improve the ranking of a website, unethically. Agrees Todd Bailey, Boston based SEO and Vice President – Marketing at WebiMax as he tells 4Ps B&M, “If you had done a lot of these things, you will see dramatic shuffling of search indexes and drops in ranking.” For numbers, while Panda affected about 12% of queries to a significant degree; Penguin affects about 3.1% of queries in English (about 3% of queries in languages like German, Chinese, Arabic, & an even bigger percentage of them in “highly-spammed” languages) to a degree that a regular user might notice. In fact, the percentage would increase as Google launches Penguin updates.

But is it what Google really wants from Penguin? No doubt, with the launch of this algorithm the search engine giant seems to favour websites that offer relevant and real content – content that people actually want to read and tell others about. But then there is more than what meets the eye. The search engine giant wants Google+ to become much more relevant and powerful tool for businesses and that too in a short span of time. Considering its deep business ties to solutions most of us use such as Gmail, Google Places, Google Maps, Google Webmaster Tools and Analytics, et al, the easiest way to achieve this target is to tweak its PageRank algorithm in favour of Google+. 

So, is there a way out for marketers? The best way to survive the “Penguin Attack” would be re-strategise their company’s SEO strategy around socially relevant content. Marketers should get rid of the perception that they need to generate a lot of content (over-optimisation; irrespective of the quality) in order to get noticed on the Internet. Instead they need to get back to the drawing boards and devise a new plan that helps them generate content which is relevant to their respective businesses. This can be done by getting featured, both in print media and electronic media, and by using tactics like Facebook cross-pollination (mutual exchange of ideas and texts among related businesses) and blog post exchange (among related businesses).

Further, the marketers also need to ensure the TG’s engagement with the brand through various online marketing techniques such as social media campaigns, referrals, CPM (cost per impression) advertising, et al. The reason is simple. The online marketing scenario is getting more dynamic with competitors now seeking out inventive and innovative ways to stay on top of search engines rankings. In the current context even that is not enough, you then have to include the ability to attract, engage and retain visitors through an ongoing process without missing a step. Agrees Michael Birch, Founder, iNET9, a Canada based Internet solutions company, as he tells 4Ps B&M, “The need of the hour is creating mutually exclusive relationships with existing and prospective customers with interactive dialogue that builds a bond of trust within your segmented target audience who are not only likely to return but attract other prospects in their circle.” Last but not the least – Don’t forget to create a Google+ page for your brand or company. Make it relevant and push quality content out. Why? As we have already said, Google pays more attention to Google+ while ranking content, authors, and users in search engine results Page (SERP).

Hence, the new algorithm from Google is nothing but yet another attempt by the search engine giant to clear the web spam and reward websites that play by its rules. It has made itself clear. Search engine optimizers, and marketers will have to step up their game and deliver quality if they really want to survive the “Penguin Attack”. And those who have been doing this, need not fear this Penguin! They are & will continue to make good returns on their tactical strategies.

  

 

 

 

“share ideas & collaborate”

Not all corporations are successful with social media. Those who break the unspoken rules of netiquette can do their reputations more harm than good. After all, the online community is remarkably efficient at policing bad behaviour. Here are a few tips on how businesses can use Facebook without losing face:

Develop a social media policy: While companies have rules for public communications like earnings reports and press releases, social media a less formal set of rules. Thus, organisations should created policies on how to manage confidential information and where to host blogs and trained employees in the new guidelines. You need to have an institutional voice & a social voice.

Integrate your customer contacts: Companies as diverse as Dell, Delta Airlines, and Gatorade, have set up listening command centers. The idea is to bring together communications, marketing, and customer service under one roof. The reason is simple. It’s helpful to be sitting close to each other, to share ideas and collaborate.

Listen first: A blog is about joining a conversation more than starting one. For instance, twenty thousand people are talking about Dell every day. The hot conversation topic today is next-generation laptops, so Direct2Dell should be talking about it. The trick in social media is being really relevant to your customer, providing things they want and need. The biggest no-no is to jump into a conversation with a marketing pitch. People don’t want to be sold, but you can make suggestions. 

 

ICMR-4Ps B&M iNet 2012

ICMR-4Ps B&M brings to you inet, a comprehensive ranking of INDIA’S Most POPULAR WEBSITES after a thorough and comprehensive analysis with research inputs from primary as well as secondary sources

4Ps Business & Marketing magazine, in association with Indian Council for Market Research (ICMR), conducted a perception survey among Internet users to identify India’s most popular websites. Here’s how we did it:

FIRST PHASE:
The first phase of the research was initiated with a single question to the respondents, “Which are your top five most preferred websites?”

This survey was conducted among 1,000 respondents across India namely Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai and Bangalore. The respondents included students, housewives, working professionals and others to generate a list of preferred websites across various categories. Based on the frequency of responses, the websites were first sorted and placed into their respective categories. The following  is the list of categories covered under the survey.
 
SECOND PHASE:
As per the table given above, 23 broad categories were taken into consideration for the next phase of the survey. In order to conduct one-on-one interviews, structured questionnaires were designed. The research was conducted in five major cities of India – New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Bangalore and Chennai; with an aggregate sample size of 1,089 respondents.

The respondent profile varied across different categories with their respective age groups, gender and education levels. Each of the respondents was asked to rate the websites on a scale of 1-10 (where 1 is the lowest and 10 is the highest) on the following parameters:

User Friendliness: The main goal of a website is to provide its visitors with a pleasant and fulfilling experience. User friendliness includes factors such as page loading speed, accessibility, navigation and information.

Look/Design: The parameter of look/design is also considered important as it creates the first impression on
the visitor. The look/design of the website is primarily based on colours, graphics, white spaces and other technical factors.
Content Quality: A website is known for its content quality apart from the overall look and design. The content quality/credibility of a website is what drives a visitor to make frequent visits to the website.

Trustworthiness: At present, there are a number of websites available for online shopping, money transfer, photo/video sharing and other transactions. In this context, overall privacy and security are all the more important for a visitor to a particular site.
Overall Satisfaction: This parameter was included to ascertain the respondents’ perception on the website in a holistic sense. 

THIRD PHASE:
The final overall ranking is a weighted average of Alexa rankings and the ICMR survey rankings. As per expert opinion and peer review, Alexa rankings have been given 30% and ICMR rankings have been given 70% weightage.

[Editors Note: Researcher should note that Alexa rankings, similar to any other Internet ranking tool, can be manipulated to a larger extent than can primary responses from a sample. Researchers should also note that a few websites that could have scored extremely high on Alexa rankings might have very low Alexa score because of their internal server security that may prohibit Alexa’s Internet crawlers from accessing their websites (typical examples include Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo! Mail et al)]

Subsequently, certain websites have featured in the ICMR survey list but do not have an Alexa ranking. Hence these websites have not been considered in the overall ranking but their individual scores have been revealed in the following pages. Also, while many websites rank high in their respective categories, they may have slipped down in overall rankings because other websites have more mass functions (search engines, social networking, web portals, et al).

Note: The Alexa rankings we have considered for the respective websites are ranks as on August 13, 2012. Also, certain categories have been omitted in the second phase of the survey e.g. Torrent sites, websites with adult content, et al. 

 

                 

OVerall rankings

Following is the final ICMR-4Ps B&M inet 2012 RANKING OF iNDIA’S MOST POPULAR WEBSITES. THE final OVERALL SCORES are the weighted aggregate of ALEXA RANKINGS (30%) AND THE ICMR SURVEY rankings (70%).

 

 

 CATEGORY-wise icmr ranks

The following tables indicate category-wise leaders in ICMR-4Ps B&M’s india’s most popular websites LISTING (FIGURES REPRESENTS icmr RANKs)

Comments

satya  on 26/10/2012

dlhlfdf

satya  on 26/10/2012

what is this

karthik ram  on 24/09/2012

good survey., 100% satisfied and mostly every net user accept this story.,

Post a Comment

Name Email Address
     
Write here...
 
Captcha Validation Code